10.3 Million U.S. Homes Have Negative Equity

The U.S. housing market is still under stress, and it will take a very, very long time for it to recover. Take a look at the chart below of the S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Index—the most prominent indicator followed by economists to assess the health of the U.S. housing market.

10.3 Million U.S. Homes Have Negative Equity image HPI SP Case Shiller Home Price Index stock chart1$$HPI S&P Case-Shiller Home Price Index stock chart

Chart courtesy of www.StockCharts.com

Now consider this: if a stock goes down by 50% one day, and then increases 10% the next day, has the price recovered? The U.S. housing market is in a very similar situation. Yes, home prices have increased since they hit their lows in late 2011, but they are far from recovering. The S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Index clearly shows that home prices are down significantly from their peak in 2006–2007.

What else is wrong with the U.S. housing market? According to the Mortgage Bankers Association’s (MBA) National Delinquency Survey, the delinquency rate for mortgage loans on one-to-four-unit residential properties increased to 7.25% of all outstanding loans at the end of the first quarter of 2013. (Source: Mortgage Bankers Association, May 9, 2013.)

And that’s not all. CoreLogic data showed that 10.3 million homes with a mortgage in the U.S. housing market had negative equity—meaning the price of the house was much less than the amount borrowed at the end of 2012. (Source: CoreLogic, March 19, 2013.)

To give you an idea about how negative the situation in the U.S housing market still is, in Nevada, more than 52% of properties with a mortgage have negative equity. Other states like Florida, Arizona, Georgia, and Michigan have a significant portion of homes with negative equity as well

With all this said, one question rises: where is the U.S. housing market headed next?

In his essay in the New York Times, Robert Shiller, founder of the S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Index, commented on the direction of the U.S. housing market, saying, “Forecasting is indeed risky, because of factors like construction productivity, inflation, and the growth and bursting of speculative bubbles in both home prices and long-term interest rates. The outlook is so ambiguous that there is no single answer to the question of housing’s potential as a long-term investment.” (Source: Shiller, R.J., “Today’s Dream House May Not Be Tomorrow’s,” New York Times, April 27th, 2013.)

The reality of the situation is that the road ahead is more uncertain now than it was before. I look at first-time home buyers as a key indicator of sustainable growth in the housing market. Unfortunately, even with mortgage rates at a record low and home prices being reasonable, first-time home buyers are not there.

What He Said:

“Over the past few weeks I’ve written about subprime lenders and how their demise will hurt the U.S. housing market, the economy and the stock market. There’s no escaping the carnage headed our way because the housing market and subprime business are falling apart. The worst of our problems, because of the easy money made available to borrowers, which fueled the housing boom that peaked in 2005, have yet to arrive.” Michael Lombardi in Profit Confidential, March 22, 2007. At the same time Michael wrote this, former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan was quoted saying, “the worst is over for the U.S. housing market and there will be no economic spillover effects from the poor housing market.”

More Business articles from Business 2 Community:

Loading...
See all articles from Business 2 Community

Friend's Activity