YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

    Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

    To get started, first

    Volcker rule should exclude all sovereign debt-Citigroup

    MEXICO CITY (Reuters) - A planned U.S. ban on banks trading for their own profit could hamper monetary policy and the ability of financial firms to manage risk unless foreign government debt is exempted, a top Citigroup executive said on Saturday.

    Manuel Medina-Mora warned that the so-called Volcker rule, which forms part of the 2010 Dodd-Frank financial oversight law and bans banks from using their own funds to make risky trades, could prevent lenders from serving their clients.

    The rule, named after U.S. economist and former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker, makes an exception for trades involving U.S. Treasuries.

    Medina-Mora said this should be extended to other sovereign debt, which global banks use for liquidity provisions and managing their asset liabilities at a local level.

    "We believe that trading in foreign sovereign debt should be exempted from the application of the Volcker rule," he told a financial conference on the sidelines of a G20 ministerial meeting in Mexico City.

    "We are concerned that the adverse impact (of the rule) on the liquidity of foreign sovereign securities could impair the ability of banks to deal with their customers and manage risks."

    "The implementation of the rule could have a significant impact on the conduct of monetary policy in many countries around the world," Medina-Mora said.

    Some foreign regulators have already asked U.S. banking agencies to expand this exemption to include more sovereign debt, arguing that otherwise it could hurt trading in their bonds.

    Bank of Canada Governor Mark Carney, who heads the Financial Stability Board, has called for the rule to be changed to exclude foreign sovereign debt.

    So far, U.S. authorities have played down their concerns.

    Mexico's top securities regulator also told conference delegates on Friday that he was worried about the issue.

    "The extra-territorial aspects of the Volcker rule are quite detrimental," said Guillermo Babatz, head of Mexico's banking and securities commission.

    Babatz said he is hearing complaints from banks about this aspect of the Volcker rule and he is concerned about it because many of Mexico's biggest banks are foreign subsidiaries of European and U.S. banks affected by the rule.

    Citigroup's Banamex unit is Mexico's second-biggest bank by assets. The largest bank in Mexico is Spain's BBVA Bancomer and Spanish bank Santander is the country's third largest.

    (Reporting By Daniel Flynn, additional reporting by Elinor Comlay; Editing by Chizu Nomiyama)

    See all articles from Reuters
     

    31 comments

    • J.Q.P  •  2 months ago
      Let Citibank fall on their own sword.
    • Dave  •  Milwaukee, Wisconsin  •  2 months ago
      I strongly disagree with Mr. Medina-Mora.
      Banks are for taking a profit from servicing customers. That is all.
      If an investment bank which makes markets wants to play with it's own money, that is a different story.
      Also, it must be said that any dam_ fool that looses money when the investment bank he/she bought shares in goes bust, eg Lehman Bros., that is just too bad, so sad.

      One way or the other Mr. Medina-Mora, you can't have your cake and eat it too as they say.

      As a stock holder of Citigroup, I am convinced that it is run by criminally larcenous and fraudulent people.

      Good day America.
    • SeekingSanity  •  2 months ago
      If these guys want to run a trading company, get out of Banking business!!! When will our worthless Congress reinstate some of the safeguards that emerged following the Great Depression? Oops, I forgot that they are owned by the financial industry.
    • A Yahoo! User  •  2 months ago
      if i get elected as president i promise i will have every single banker,wall street exe and congresman involved in the economic turmoil over the past 4 year beheaded in the form of a public execution..thank you.
      • James 2 months ago
        You can start with Barney Frank and Chris Dodd
      • A Yahoo! User 2 months ago
        done
    • Lonnie  •  Irvine, California  •  2 months ago
      BANKS HAVE WALLSTREET CONGRESS IN THEIR POCKETS
      • DT 2 months ago
        don't you mean REPUBLICANS IN CONGRESS?
    • Lorenzo  •  Mililani Town, Hawaii  •  2 months ago
      Several times Argentina has defaulted on big loans to big US banks-but banks did not get burned-the taxpayers picked it up so as to not let the banks fail. As long as the banks can continue to be able to make loans to countries run by thugs and thieves with no risk to themselves,it will be a neverending cycle. Would it not be nice for us to be able to borrow a trillion from China or JAPAN and not have to worry about paying it back?
    • tomdiesel  •  Highmore, South Dakota  •  2 months ago
      Citigroup is not a bank it is a casino, when they merged the big banks with the investment banks they all turned into casino's.
    • John  •  2 months ago
      CitiGroup is telling us this strictly for the good of the country.
    • amym  •  Mt Hamilton, California  •  2 months ago
      These banksters are all still playing the same old scam games on us!! Don't fall for their pity party, poor me bull!!
      • Ro 2 months ago
        You are full of crap. The Fed Government ... biggest scam of all -- unless you are the 50% that don't pay taxes, then nevermind.
      • amym 2 months ago
        Ro, don't get testy now cause the fed is included in this historic scam. I pay my overly fair share of taxes too! Now if they would just cut that #$%$ military out we'd pay less in taxes and there'd still be plenty to go around!!
    • Larry Dickson  •  San Diego, California  •  2 months ago
      This is totally absurd! Sovereign debt is the WORST RISK OF ALL, as Greece shows! Kick these bankers out of their jobs and replace them with retired high school math teachers.
      • Ro 2 months ago
        just not american liberal math teachers
    • s404n1tn0cc  •  Irvine, California  •  2 months ago
      Banks should not be In the stock market at all. It's traditional purpose was to raise capitol for local businesses. If they want to take risk ..I don't mind, so long as its their own Private Capitol. They should not gamble with other peoples money. This is called prudence.
    • saxonmor  •  2 months ago
      If banks acted responsibly, we wouldn't have to figure out how to tailor regulations to make them workable. But too many bankers are less driven by responsibility than they are by greed. They have no one but themselves to blame.
    • Angeles Andy  •  2 months ago
      Franks and Dodd should be in jail for there involvment in the real estate disaster, and instead write rules to govern all banks....

      Only time will tell, remember, that
      In 2003, while the ranking minority member on the Financial Services Committee, Frank opposed a Bush administration proposal, in response to accounting scandals, for transferring oversight of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac from Congress and the Department of Housing and Urban Development to a new agency that would be created within the Treasury Department. The proposal, supported by the head of Fannie Mae, reflected the administration's belief that Congress "neither has the tools, nor the stature" for adequate oversight. Frank stated, "These two entities ...are not facing any kind of financial crisis ... The more people exaggerate these problems, the more pressure there is on these companies, the less we will see in terms of affordable housing." In 2003, Frank also stated "I do not want the same kind of focus on safety and soundness [in the regulation of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac] that we have in the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the Office of Thrift Supervision. I want to roll the dice a little bit more in this situation towards subsidised housing." In July 2008, Frank said in an CNBC interview, "I think this is a case where Fannie and Freddie are fundamentally sound, that they are not in danger of going under. They’re not the best investments these days from the long-term standpoint going back. I think they are in good shape going forward."

      And people think this idiot is a economic genius with his countrywide buddy Dodd....... Sheep to the edge, almost time to follow your shepherd over the cliff!
      • DT 2 months ago
        Right dumbo. Let's let the REpublicans let the banks run riot. You're ignorant.
    • rustybucket55  •  Warren, Ohio  •  2 months ago
      The problem is that it isn't the banks risking their own money. They risk and lose the investors money! I guess this author forgot that!!
    • Lonnie  •  Irvine, California  •  2 months ago
      Banks crafted the bill they will come out on top therepublican wallstreet congress will make sure of that
    • Anonymous IV  •  2 months ago
      FACTOID: Citibank has BRANCHES throughout MEXICO and the CARRIBEANS, which gave
      BAD LOANS to NO INCOME-VERICATION MORTGAGES APPLICANTS...1/3 of Total 1.5
      Million ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS were APPROVED for Toxic Home Loans,offshore not Main
      Street USA which lead to the Housing Bubble 2007-Present. Applicants needed only sign
      the CONTRACTS by marking the Letter......................X...................................................
    • DT  •  2 months ago
      If Citigroup wants it, IT'S BAD.
    • Zebra  •  Mt Hamilton, California  •  2 months ago
      If banks could manage risk, we wouldn't have to bail them out. If a bank wants to short securities it sells its customers, that should be outlawed. Betting the market will collapse is not managing risk. Aren't banks supposed to be conservative?
    • Peter  •  2 months ago
      This is how they operate, make a rule that has unforseen consequences for them, then modify it so they can keep doing what they do best, take the wealth of the people for their own purposes. The Volker Rule wouldn't let the banks buy each others risky loans to countries that are spending themselves into the hole. This scares all the countries that need the funding to keep their bloated governments running. When they say customers, they mean other banks and governments, they are not talking about the guy on the street. Just in case it isn't obvious, the world is being run by the central banks and their phony money, and they are extracting all they can from the citizens of every country. The extractions are being called bailouts, but it is the taxpayer who is footing the bill. Guaranteed by government law.
    • Stiglitz  •  2 months ago
      And someone thinks that Greece is a a more stable investment than a US Blue Chip company? HA! Mr. Medina-Mora is just begging for loopholes.
    Loading...
    SMALL BUSINESS OPINION POLL

    Is cash flow management a headache for you?

    Loading...
    Poll Choice Options

    Friend's Activity